In traditional financial markets, “dividends” refer to the practice of publicly listed companies distributing profits to shareholders in the form of cash or stock, which is a core way for shareholders to obtain investment returns. However, in Web3 In the cryptocurrency space, the connotation of “dividends” is being redefined—it goes beyond simple profit distribution, integrating token economics, governance power struggles, and on-chain yield reconstruction. In traditional dividend distribution, shareholders share company profits based on their shareholding ratio. However, the Web3 world breaks this unidirectional model; while token holders contribute funds and liquidity, they are often excluded from the actual profit distribution, creating a unique phenomenon of “unequal rights for coin holders.”
In the Web2 business model, companies raise funds by offering equity to VCs, who exit through an IPO to gain returns, while retail investors rarely participate in early dividend distribution. The breakthrough of Web3 lies in the fact that the issuance of tokens is essentially the process of equity listing, which includes retail investors in the early financing system. However, problems also arise: equity investors enjoy profit dividends from company operations and can cash out through tokens; meanwhile, token holders face the dilemma of ‘paying without rights’.
Projects like STONKS are trying to break this deadlock: all participants can fairly acquire chips, without preferential treatment for preferred stocks, by electing a decision-making committee through the community, exploring a true path of equal rights for stock and coin.
Tokens play a complex role in Web3 business models: they are both equity assets and imply debt attributes.
Eliminating debt requires relying on two major strategies:
Some DeFi projects directly distribute protocol income (such as swap fees, lending interest) to token stakers, for example:
FEC (Fortune Earnings Coupon) proposes the concept of “spending is earning”: when users spend, the system destroys part of the FEC and mints ADN airdrop nodes, which return 10,000 FEC (10 times the investment) over 100 cycles. The return mechanism uses a compound interest weight design, resulting in exponential growth of later returns, incentivizing long-term holding.
DAO organizations decide on the use of treasury funds through proposal voting, and some projects airdrop profits to governance token holders in the form of stablecoins, achieving transparency in on-chain dividends.
Traditional listed companies are trying to incorporate crypto assets into their balance sheets, creating a new play of “coin-stock linkage”:
Web3 companies enhance dividend distribution efficiency by optimizing global structures:
Structured products (such as the SAFT agreement) become compliant vehicles: investors initially receive interest on stablecoins, and later can convert to project tokens at a discount, balancing fixed income and speculative space.
The dividend distribution of future Web3 will surpass the old logic of “shareholders exclusively profiting” and evolve towards “contributors sharing value.” The ADN nodes of FEC will convert consumption behavior into rights to earnings, Pendle’s YT tokens will slice and redistribute revenue streams, and DAO treasury governance will make coin holders decision-makers in dividend distribution. When on-chain contracts can automatically execute creator royalties (such as NFT resale shares), and when the BTC on the balance sheet of publicly traded companies becomes shared assets for shareholders, the definition of dividends has been reborn in the crucible of Web3—it is no longer a check, but a programmable network of rights to earnings.