🔥 Gate 動態大使專屬發帖福利任務第四期報名正式開啓!
還沒成爲動態大使?立即報名參與 👉️https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/4937
參與大使活動,6月9日至6月15日期間每日發帖,根據帖子內容評級,瓜分 $300 獎池!
🎁 獎勵詳情:
一、S級周度排名獎
S級:本週7日均完成發帖且整體帖子內容質量分數>90分可獲S級,挑選2名優質內容大使每人$50手續費返現券。
二、A/B 等級瓜分獎
根據各位動態大使發帖數量及帖子內容質量獲評等級,按評定等級獲獎:
A級:本週至少5日完成發帖且整體帖子內容質量90>分數>80可獲A級,從A級用戶中選出5名大使每人$20手續費返現券
B級:本週至少3日完成發帖且整體帖子內容質量80>分數>60可獲B級,從B級用戶中選出10名大使每人$10手續費返現券
📍 活動規則:
1.至少3日完成發帖才有機會獲獎。
2.根據發帖天數和整體發帖內容質量分數給予等級判定,分爲S/A/B等級,在各等級下選擇幸運大使獲獎。
💡 帖子評分標準:
1.每帖不少於30字。
2.內容需原創、有獨立見解,具備深度和邏輯性。
3.鼓勵發布市場行情、交易知識、幣種研究等主題,使用圖例或視頻可提高評分。
4.禁止發布FUD、抄襲或詆毀內容,違規將取消資格。
5.手續費返現券按20%返現比例,有效期30天,請在有效期內及時使用,手
Russia’s Supreme Court: Criminals’ Bitcoin-to-Fiat Trades Constitute Money Laundering
Per a report from the Russian legal affairs-focused media outlet RAPSI, the Supreme Court made the judgement in a case involving a citizen who sold narcotics to crypto-paying drug users.
The court heard that the man produced and sold the banned stimulant mephedrone and “received money from buyers in [Bitcoin],” which he then converted into fiat rubles.
He then proceeded to transfer this fiat to accounts and cards belonging to his live-in lover’s daughter.
A lower court originally found him guilty of drug trafficking, but acquitted him on charges of money laundering.
The court at the time ruled that financial transactions with fiat converted from Bitcoin could not be considered “laundered” unless they were “introduced into economic circulation.”
The man raised some $100,000 worth of fiat rubles from his drug deals.
Prosecutors were unhappy with this initial ruling, so took the case to the High Court.
But the High Court upheld the original verdict, forcing the prosecution to take the case to the Supreme Court – the highest court in the nation.
The Supreme Court appears to have taken a very different stance on the matter, however.
It interpreted the relevant section of the Criminal Code, which pertains to the “laundering of funds obtained by criminal means,” to related to all financial transactions involving the proceeds of crime.
The court said that even if the convict did not actually use the funds, the mere fact that he had transferred the fiat to another person’s bank accounts showed that the cash was already de facto in “economic circulation.”
Prosecutors presented evidence of the drug dealer using “technological tools” to mask the source of the money he put into his lover’s daughter’s accounts.
The Supreme Court ruled that the criminal code could be interpreted as meaning that “funds converted from virtual assets” could be considered laundered if they were “acquired as a result of a crime.”
The court pointed to precedent from a 2019 ruling in a case whereby a Supreme Court judge ruled that the “purchase of cryptocurrency for criminal proceeds” could be considered a form of money laundering.
Courts and prosecutors are likely to use the ruling as legal precedent.
And that will likely make seizing and liquidating tokens easier in future crypto-related cases.
It will also mean that courts can hand out much harsher sentences in criminal cases where crypto is involved.
Earlier this month, the Russian secret service arrested a citizen who allegedly sent a crypto donation to the Ukrainian armed forces on treason charges.