In a significant move, Binance, a dominant figure in the crypto world, has filed for a protective court order against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This action comes in light of what Binance describes as extensive and unwarranted requests for information from the regulatory authority.
Delving into the specifics, in a submission to the US District Court of Columbia, BAM Trading and BAM Management, which operate under the umbrella of Binance U.S., asserted that they have already met the regulator’s data needs. The essence of their argument revolves around the SEC’s demands being not just expansive, but also placing an undue strain on their operations.
One of the primary objectives of the protective order is to curtail the scope of the SEC’s reach. Binance suggests limiting the regulatory body to merely four depositions from BAM employees. Additionally, the crypto giant has expressed its intent to exempt the depositions of key figures, specifically BAM’s Chief utive and its Chief Financial Officer, without explicitly mentioning any names.
This tussle between Binance and the SEC traces back to June when the regulatory body leveled substantial allegations against both Binance and its Chief utive, Changpeng Zhao. These accusations were far from minor, highlighting a purported “web of deception.” The SEC’s 13-charge list was comprehensive, ranging from claims of Binance artificially boosting its trading volumes to accusations of misleading investors regarding its market surveillance mechanisms.
Buy Binance Coin (BNB) quickly and securely with PayPal, credit card or bank transfer at eToro. Visit Website <<Yet, Binance remains unyielding in its stance. They’ve pointed out that the SEC, despite its fervent investigations, has failed to produce any concrete evidence hinting at the misuse or misappropriation of customer assets.
Moreover, the SEC, it seems, hasn’t shown much flexibility. The regulatory body has turned down BAM’s attempts to reasonably confine its information requisitions and remains steadfast against the motion for a protective order, as per the recent filing.
As this legal saga continues, both parties – Binance and the SEC – have yet to offer a public comment on the unfolding situation. The crypto community awaits further developments with bated breath, as this case might set significant precedents for future regulatory interactions.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone:
Invest in Binance and 70+ cryptocurrencies and 3,000 other assets.
0% commission on stocks – buy in bulk or just a fraction from as little as $10.
Copy top-performing traders in real time, automatically.
Regulated by financial authorities including FAC and FINRA.
2.8 Million Users
Get Started
المحتوى هو للمرجعية فقط، وليس دعوة أو عرضًا. لا يتم تقديم أي مشورة استثمارية أو ضريبية أو قانونية. للمزيد من الإفصاحات حول المخاطر، يُرجى الاطلاع على إخلاء المسؤولية.
BREAKING: Binance Joins Ripple (XRP) to Fight for Customers, Investors, and the Entire Industry with Protective Order Against SEC and Gary Gensler
In a significant move, Binance, a dominant figure in the crypto world, has filed for a protective court order against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This action comes in light of what Binance describes as extensive and unwarranted requests for information from the regulatory authority.
Delving into the specifics, in a submission to the US District Court of Columbia, BAM Trading and BAM Management, which operate under the umbrella of Binance U.S., asserted that they have already met the regulator’s data needs. The essence of their argument revolves around the SEC’s demands being not just expansive, but also placing an undue strain on their operations.
One of the primary objectives of the protective order is to curtail the scope of the SEC’s reach. Binance suggests limiting the regulatory body to merely four depositions from BAM employees. Additionally, the crypto giant has expressed its intent to exempt the depositions of key figures, specifically BAM’s Chief utive and its Chief Financial Officer, without explicitly mentioning any names.
This tussle between Binance and the SEC traces back to June when the regulatory body leveled substantial allegations against both Binance and its Chief utive, Changpeng Zhao. These accusations were far from minor, highlighting a purported “web of deception.” The SEC’s 13-charge list was comprehensive, ranging from claims of Binance artificially boosting its trading volumes to accusations of misleading investors regarding its market surveillance mechanisms.
Moreover, the SEC, it seems, hasn’t shown much flexibility. The regulatory body has turned down BAM’s attempts to reasonably confine its information requisitions and remains steadfast against the motion for a protective order, as per the recent filing.
As this legal saga continues, both parties – Binance and the SEC – have yet to offer a public comment on the unfolding situation. The crypto community awaits further developments with bated breath, as this case might set significant precedents for future regulatory interactions.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: