稳健,是 Gate 持续增长的核心动力。
真正的成长,不是顺风顺水,而是在市场低迷时依然坚定前行。我们或许能预判牛熊市的大致节奏,但绝无法精准预测它们何时到来。特别是在熊市周期,才真正考验一家交易所的实力。
Gate 今天发布了2025年第二季度的报告。作为内部人,看到这些数据我也挺惊喜的——用户规模突破3000万,现货交易量逆势环比增长14%,成为前十交易所中唯一实现双位数增长的平台,并且登顶全球第二大交易所;合约交易量屡创新高,全球化战略稳步推进。
更重要的是,稳健并不等于守成,而是在面临严峻市场的同时,还能持续创造新的增长空间。
欢迎阅读完整报告:https://www.gate.com/zh/announcements/article/46117
Ripple (XRP) v. SEC Lawsuit Aftermath: Company to Increase Headcount Outside of US
Brad Garlinghouse – Chief utive Officer of Ripple – revealed in a recent interview with Bloomberg that 80% of the the crypto firm’s staff hiring this year will be outside the United States.
Recall that the entity has an ongoing legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The latter accused the former of breaching laws by conducting XRP sales years ago, classifying the native token of the enterprise as unregistered security.
Ripple Aims at Countries With ‘Clear Rules’
Garlinghouse said that the majority of new employees that Ripple plans to hire by the end of 2023 will be based not in the United States. He pointed out to regions like Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai, and the United Kingdom where “governments are partnering with the industry and you’re seeing leadership, they’re providing clear rules and you’re seeing growth.”
On the other hand, the regulatory hurdles in the world’s largest economy seem to have hampered the operations of the San Francisco-based organization in its homeland.
The US SEC launched a legal battle against Ripple in 2020, alleging that the latter raised funds in 2013 through the sale of digital assets known as XRP in an unregistered securities offering to investors in America and across the globe.
The lawsuit recently reached to a point that benefits the blockchain firm. As CryptoPotato reported in mid-July, a US Judge ruled that most of Ripple’s XRP sales didn’t constitute an offer of investment contracts.
The SEC Strikes Back
Despite marking a landmark court victory nearly two months ago and having the upper hand in the battle, Ripple’s win is far from being decisive as the watchdog formally filed to appeal the ruling.
Its disaccord focuses on two particular XRP sales “programmatic” (which were offered to public buyers) and such classified by the court as “other distributions.”
It is worth noting that Judge Torres has already determined that the former process did not violate securities laws.